Still North

Psychological Safety: A Leadership Perspective

Introduction

Psychological safety is a cornerstone of high-performing teams and organisations, yet its nuances are often misunderstood. For leaders, cultivating psychological safety is not just about creating a “safe space”; it’s about fostering an environment where creativity, innovation, and growth can thrive, even in the face of discomfort. Let’s explore what psychological safety is, its origins, the benefits and challenges, and practical strategies for leaders to foster it within their teams.

What is psychological safety?

At its core, psychological safety is the shared belief that team members can express themselves—their ideas, concerns, mistakes, and questions—without fear of embarrassment, rejection, or retribution. It’s the assurance that their contributions are valued, even if they challenge the status quo.

The origins: Amy Edmondson’s research

The concept was first formalised by Dr. Amy Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School, in her seminal research in the 1990s. Edmondson found that psychologically safe teams were more likely to admit errors, learn from them, and collaborate effectively. Surprisingly, teams that reported more mistakes often outperformed those that reported fewer because the act of acknowledging errors fostered learning and improvement.
Her work demonstrated that psychological safety is essential for innovation and adaptability, particularly in complex and fast-changing environments. It’s not about avoiding mistakes; it’s about creating a culture where people feel safe to take risks and learn from failures.

The four stages of psychological safety (Timothy R. Clark)

Building on Edmondson’s work, Timothy R. Clark identified four progressive stages of psychological safety:

1. Inclusion safety

The foundation where individuals feel they belong and are accepted for who they are. Leaders must ensure this stage does not devolve into paternalism, where inclusion becomes overprotective and stifling rather than empowering.

2. Learner safety

The assurance that individuals can ask questions, seek feedback, and learn without fear of judgment. If mishandled, this stage can lead to exploitation, where individuals feel pressured to learn or adapt without adequate support or acknowledgement.

3. Contributor safety

The freedom to contribute ideas and make a difference, knowing their input is valued. Leaders must guard against exploitation at this stage, ensuring that contributions are recognised and not taken for granted.

4. Challenger safety

The highest level, where individuals feel secure enough to challenge the status quo without fear of retaliation. However, this stage can risk becoming performative if leaders encourage challenges but fail to act on them meaningfully.
Creative abrasion is the gatepost between contributor and challenger safety. It involves embracing constructive conflict, often described as “creative abrasion.” This dynamic process arises when diverse perspectives collide in a productive way, challenging ideas, refining solutions, and driving innovation.
Creative abrasion flourishes in environments where psychological safety encourages open dissent, robust debate, and exploration of unconventional ideas without fear of negative repercussions. Leaders play a pivotal role in fostering this environment by framing conflict as a necessary driver of creativity and ensuring it remains constructive rather than divisive. This stage unlocks the potential to transform differences into powerful opportunities for growth and breakthrough thinking.

Leaders must guide their teams through these stages, recognising that psychological safety is a journey, not a destination. They must also be vigilant to avoid creating environments where psychological safety is either misused or undermined by hidden power dynamics.

Psychological safety: Local leadership, organisational impact

While psychological safety often starts at the team level, its effects ripple across the organisation. Local leaders play a pivotal role in establishing and maintaining it. However, organisational culture and systems can either reinforce or undermine these efforts. Leaders must advocate for systemic support—policies, values, and practices—that sustain psychological safety beyond individual teams.

The misuse and weaponisation of psychological safety

As with any powerful concept, psychological safety can be misused. In some cases, it becomes a shield to avoid accountability or difficult conversations. Teams may fall into the trap of “false safety,” mistaking harmony for psychological safety. Real psychological safety includes the courage to engage in “crunchy conversations”—those that are uncomfortable but necessary for growth and progress. Leaders must balance safety with discomfort to avoid stagnation.

How leaders can foster psychological safety

What disables psychological safety in a team?

Several factors can erode psychological safety, including:

How psychological safety feels

Psychological safety feels like trust, openness, and shared purpose. Team members experience:

What psychological safety unlocks

Psychological safety is a driver of exceptional performance and engagement. It:

The need for discomfort

True psychological safety includes the ability to confront challenges and engage in difficult conversations. Discomfort is not the enemy; it’s a sign of growth. Leaders must create an environment where discomfort is framed as a necessary part of innovation and progress.

Conclusion

Psychological safety is a dynamic, powerful concept that, when understood and applied effectively, transforms teams and organisations. It requires courage, consistency, and a commitment to both safety and accountability. Leaders who embrace this balance unlock the potential for creativity, innovation, and meaningful engagement, paving the way for long-term success.

Still Curious?

Sign up for our newsletter and get just the right amount of stimulating content to help you make waves in the right direction.

    Scroll to Top